Philippines protests China’s harvest of giant clams

PH protests China’s harvest of giant clams
Dona Z. Pazzibugan, Jhesset O. Enano, Julie M. Aurelio April 17, 2019

INTERCEPTED A Philippine Navy photo released in April 2012 by the Department of Foreign Affairs shows Filipino troops inspecting a Chinese fishing vessel loaded with giant clams after it was intercepted off Panatag (Scarborough) Shoal. The DFA on Tuesday said Chinese poachers were again caught engaging in destructive activities in the shoal recently, prompting Manila to send a diplomatic note to Beijing. —PHOTO COURTESY OF DFA
MANILA, Philippines — The Philippines will take legal action against China for illegally harvesting endangered giant clams and destroying fragile corals at Panatag (Scarborough) Shoal, which Chinese forces seized in 2012 after a two-month standoff with the Philippine Navy, Foreign Secretary Teodoro Locsin Jr. said on Tuesday.

Also on Tuesday, the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) and a group of fishermen from Palawan and Zambales provinces asked the Supreme Court to order the government to prosecute foreign poachers and land reclamation contractors in the West Philippine Sea.

West Philippine Sea is the local name of the waters within the country’s 370-kilometer exclusive economic zone in the South China Sea.

Locsin said the legal office of the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) was preparing its case against China for causing serious environmental damage to the shoal. (See related story on A11)

“We just caught them doing that recently, filed a diplomatic note, and will be taking legal action,” Locsin said on Twitter.

In an interview with CNN Philippines on Tuesday, he said the National Task Force for the West Philippine Sea had verified the destructive activities of Chinese vessels at Panatag.

“We protest this. We said this is illegal and in fact you (China) are also violating conventions on environmental protection for which we can take legal action,” Locsin said. “They have basically destroyed breeding grounds.”

Palace backing

Malacañang backed the DFA’s protests.

“As far as we’re concerned, that (Panatag Shoal) is ours. We will be objecting to any intrusion to our own territory,” said presidential spokesperson Salvador Panelo.

“If it’s our territory, therefore, it is an affront to our territory and to our sovereignty,” Panelo said.

In its petition, the IBP, the largest association of lawyers in the Philippines, criticized the government for failing or refusing to enforce the international arbitral court’s ruling in 2016 that nullified China’s claim to virtually the entire South China Sea while upholding Philippine sovereignty over the West Philippine Sea.

China has ignored the ruling.

The IBP said the Chinese were destroying the coral reefs, harvesting endangered giant clams, using explosives and cyanide to catch fish, and building artificial islands.

“Clearly, the damage is brought upon by lack of enforcement of Philippine environmental laws,” it said.

It asked the high court to issue a writ of kalikasan and to order the heads of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Department of Agriculture, Philippine Coast Guard, Philippine Navy, Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, Philippine National Police and Department of Justice to protect Panatag Shoal, Ayungin (Second Thomas) Shoal and Panganiban (Mischief) Reef.

New case for int’l court

A maritime law expert and an environmental group also urged the government to take legal action against Chinese fishermen who harvested the giant clams at Panatag.

The “outrageous” collection of the giant clams could be another case against Beijing that Manila could take to the Permanent Court of Arbitration, said Jay Batongbacal, director of the University of the Philippines Institute for Maritime Affairs and Law of the Sea.

“This is nothing less than an environmental crime that is being perpetrated by China and its agencies,” Batongbacal said in an interview with the Inquirer.

Aside from the possible arbitration case, he said the Philippine government might also request a provisional measure from the International Court of Justice to call on China to stop its destructive activity.

Batongbacal said the Philippines could call out China “for being a state sponsor of illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing” and urge other countries to stop trading with the Asian powerhouse, particularly for fisheries and marine products.

Fisheries code violation

Rose-Liza Eisma-Osorio, managing trustee of Philippine Earth Justice Center, said the Chinese had violated the Philippine Fisheries Code, which prohibits fishing for or taking rare, threatened or endangered species.

Giant clams are listed under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna, and are considered vulnerable species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature due to various threats, such as overfishing, pollution, climate change and poaching.

Batongbacal said the government should pursue the cases against the Chinese fishermen, as well as Chinese coast guards and demand that Beijing turn them over for prosecution.

“This is such a clear and blatant violation of our laws,” he said. “It is an obvious slap in the face against us.”

For two weeks now, the Philippines has been vocal about China’s activities in the maritime territories claimed by the country.

‘Swarm’ around Pag-asa

Malacañang and the DFA have issued strongly worded statements against China for “swarming” the Philippine-occupied Pag-asa (Thitu) Island with nearly 300 Chinese vessels since January.

President Duterte himself has told China to “lay off” Pag-asa, the biggest of nine islands and shoals occupied by Filipinos in the South China Sea, saying that if the Chinese “touched” it, he would deploy troops on a “suicide mission” in response.

Locsin said he had filed a diplomatic protest for every incident reported by the West Philippine Sea task force and that the DFA invoked the international arbitral court’s ruling each time.

He admitted that the DFA did not take it well when the arbitral victory was “downplayed.”

Mr. Duterte has set aside the ruling in favor of enhancing ties with China, hoping that the Philippines would get more aid and investments from the economic giant.